Pinterest revisited...

After my rather heated little rant earlier this month about Pinterest I thought I better clear the air about how I'm feeling about it.
This week Pinterest sent an email stating that they were updating their terms and also The Window Seat have updated their involvement in the matter with a clear post about these changes.

 Essentially Pinterest have made one change to their terms
 they won't be selling your images.
I think its fantastic that they changed this - I didn't think they were anyway but as I said before, just because it was unlikely, it doesn't make it right and it wasn't hard for them to remove a term that they didn't actually need, so some brownie points for them for listening to that concern.

However, everything else is still essentially the same - when you upload an image under the terms
 you still either claim to own the content, or it is content that you or Pinterest will not get in trouble for using.

This is still the game changer for me - to use Pinterest correctly, the only images that I would be 100% sure that I could use/pin, would be my own... and I don't want to use it like that. A lot of people commented on my last post that Pinterest is a great tool for bloggers - just like other sites - and I agree - if you use it correctly and for your own promotion in a tasteful way, it is a great tool.

But I don't want a marketing tool for my blog - I want a site where I can bookmark things that I find on the internet without claiming these images as my own or risking myself, or negatively affecting the rightful image owner in any way.

One statement from The Window Seats response was:


"Pinterest provides an online platform for sharing content, and you must be comfortable with the possible risk that comes with using the site."  Kyle from The Window Seat

And after much consideration, I'm not really comfortable with Pinterest or the risks that come with it anymore. I had a go at pinning just my images last week but it felt silly, all my photos are on Flickr, or on here... having them in another place just seemed pointless to me.

I think the real reason that I'm so upset about Pinterest is that it felt so right.... it felt safe, it was fun, I had everything I wanted in one place, I enjoyed pinning the things that I had found to share with people (I rarely repinned, it's not as much fun as finding things yourself is it...) and I felt like I was doing everything correctly but I wasn't.

In many ways I know that I'm quite idealistic, I want the internet to be nice, I want people to respect other people's property (digital or otherwise), I want to see credit where credit is due... but the world isn't always like that, I can't control people and neither can Pinterest so I understand that they have to cover their own backs (everyone does these days right) but honestly, I don't like it...

However, I can control my own actions, so I won't be pinning anymore. Whilst this seems to be a topic about law and risk, for me this is also about morals and what's right and wrong and although the risks may be lower now, it still doesn't feel right to me anymore... which is a shame.

Note: Carrie has asked me if I mind people pinning my images and weirdly, I don't mind that at all (especially now that Pinterest can't sell them) but if you do, please do credit back to my blog - the law in the UK states that 'The law gives the creators of literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works, sound recordings, broadcasts, films and typographical arrangement of published editions, rights to control the ways in which their material may be used.' automatically and I am happy for my images to appear on the Pinterest site. I would not be happy however if they were edited/sold/misused/reprinted so please pin responsibly :)  If you are happy with your pinning morals, then so am I!

Note 2: The above note may change if this comes about... that would be bad.

Discussing Pinterest...

I've been debating with myself whether to post this or not - I don't usually wade into these discussions within the blog world but this time I think its important that I say what I want to say... Please be aware though that this is only my opinion from reading other articles, researching and drawing my own conclusions, this is not legal advice.
After 3 years of blogging, I often feel like a 'blogging old biddy', watching the blogosphere grow with new blogs arriving, older blogs quietly fading away and myself, plodding along steadily, sharing my photos, trying to support others and do what I do. Most of the time, I watch/read and feel incredibly proud and sometimes I just shake my head, a bit bemused.
This time however, I am, to be frank - angry and frustrated...
Not long after starting my blog, I decided that I wasn't happy reblogging other peoples work, or using other peoples photos on posts - for one, I didn't want to upset other bloggers/photographers by taking their work and using it, and the complications of copyright, licensing and stealing honestly just disturbed me... so I started taking my own photos to share on here and I guess really, that is one of the main reasons that my photos came about - they are mine to share and post here under my terms and I value that.
Sometimes I find something so amazing that I want to share it with you and in those cases, I approach the blogger/photographer and ask for their permission before I post it on here... for me it is the right thing to do. Of course, I'm not saying everyone has to do that - in fact Pia, Erin and Yvette have already put together a fantastic poster that essentially covers everything you should think about before posting other peoples images anywhere and if you do have any doubts, I highly recommend it as a great place to start.
Pinterest came around at very convenient time for me - I was in the process of deleting my Tumblr and even though my Tumblr was very pretty and easy on the eye, it was full of reblogged entries without sources or credit and as hard as I tried, there was no way for me to make it right or feel comfortable with the process, so I deleted it.

Pinterest seemed different - first, it was a site that always had the sources of the images available and I loved that - if I shared something with people then they could immediately get to the source themselves and know whose work it was, I still think that this is something amazing about the site and I love the community feel about it. I also love the concept of it and the fact that it seems to be such a great way to share things with my friends as well as bookmark things for myself.

So, why I am I frustrated?
I am frustrated because as a blogger - etiquette, copyright, licensing, right of use and doing things properly is important to me, as an artist, the use of my work and terms that are applied to them are important to me and as a member of the Pinterest community, my legal responsibilites and protection  are important to me. And if these things are important to you too, then I think you should be equally as frustrated.

So, why the Pinterest confusion?

A lot of people are confused about Pinterest because even on About page - Pinterest says that it is a virtual pinboard. It says that Pinterest lets you organize and share all the beautiful things you find on the web." However, when you read the terms, you realise that this isn't what it lets you do.

How do the Pinterest terms affect you as a 'Pinner'?
First, to pin any content, you agree that "You are solely responsible for all Member Content that you make available through the Site"- you "are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content" or what you are uploading will not "infringe, misappropriate or violate a third party’s patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights"
So either you own the content, or it is content that you or Pinterest will not get in trouble for using.

 Of course, if this was a blogging site then that would seem fine -I would be happy with that - I do only post images on here which are mine, or images that I will not get in trouble for using - by asking for permission to use them on my blog. But Pinterest isn't a blog and it doesn't claim to be... and how do you 'find' something that you already own? 

Secondly, Pinterest contradicts its own terms by saying 'Credit your Sources' and 'Avoid Self Promotion'. If I am crediting my sources then that means I am not using images that I own, and more likely - images that I would actually get in trouble for using... I love the idea of crediting when sharing, but not if it means that I am actually declaring that I own something which I don't. Also, how do I avoid self promotion if the only thing that I have the right to pin are items that I own?
So the chances are that, due to the Pinterest terms, the fact that you probably don't own all the images you pin, and the fact that most images will be protected by copyright, patent or trademark somehow - you are illegally pinning images onto your boards.

Of course, this may never be an issue for you - it's only really an issue if the person who actually owns the content rightfully makes a fuss about this.

However just because something is unlikely to happen, this does not make it right. 

Unbelievably, this isn't actually the part that actually upsets me the most - in many ways, like Tumblr, this would just make me delete my account and I probably will, as I don't want to declare images as mine when they aren't and that is fine, it is my choice, I can't agree to their terms if I want to use their site the way that it is intended.

How do the Pinterest terms affect you as a content owner?

(Update 27.03.2012 - Pinterest have updated their terms to address the following,
so this is no longer relevant)


  As a photographer/owner of content this is where I get very upset and confused and to be honest, its also the point at where Pinterest stops being a nice, social, sharing website site for me. Not only do you first have to declare that you own the pin when you agree to the Pinterest terms, but also:


"By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sub license, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services"


Um, I'm sorry, but what? Why is this even there? Why do Pinterest need licence for most of these things?! Public display, I understand... that is effectively what their site does - but modify? licence? SELL?! To who? Why?
Why would I upload my own images onto Pinterest so that they could use them like that? For free? 


Now I'm not saying that Pinterest have sold any images, as far as I'm aware, they don't... but the very existence of this term, means that they could, although I can imagine it is unlikely.
However just because something is unlikely to happen, this does not make it right.

So why does Pinterest have these terms?

I'm not stupid, you're not stupid... we all understand at some level about copyrighting, stealing, right of use... and Pinterest to be fair to them are just trying to cover their own backs, however in doing so they have made their site redundant. Although you can pin your own content to share legally, you have to agree to some very specific terms as to what Pinterest can then do with those images and try as you might, you can not 'share all the beautiful things you find on the web" lawfully.


What others have said:

But isn't that similar to an image of yours coming up in a Google search?

Ok, now that is tough – as far as I am aware and can find out - legally it’s not the same, as Google do not have terms that mean they have the licensing agreements “to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content”. Google complies with Fair Use policies and is therefore a reference tool for the public.

In theory Pinterest could be viewed as the same, but as soon as it asks for a ‘worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license’ of content, then their intentions have changed – that statement alone means that the content isn’t just for public or fair use, but that it can be used for Pinterests gain. 
If you upload content onto the internet then you are at risk anyway, how is this different?

Like I said before, I am not stupid and you are not stupid. Most photographers/artists/content owners work very hard to make sure that they retain the licencing to their work and if they do upload it onto the internet then it is on their terms - my photos are mostly on here (where I have my little note and copyright buttons) and on Flickr - whose terms I am happy with. I don't put my images onto Facebook, I don't trust them and most of my images are on here are through Flickr as I don't trust Blogger at the moment, especially with Google+.
And again, just because it happens elsewhere, it doesn't make it right.
So now what and how did this happen?
Honestly, I don't know... in some ways I am more frustrated with myself for not taking the time to find out about Pinterest properly, but at the same time, Pinterest contradicts itself and suggests that it is something which it isn't... It seemed so good - you shared, you credited, no one got hurt, but of course, that's not how things work out. I can see what it wants to be and I love the concept, but its current terms mean that there is no way it can be used as it was originally intended and with the complications of copyright, licensing, right of use and fair use laws, I have no idea how they can rectify the situation.
All I can do is remove the pins that I have put on there and perhaps even ask people to remove my photos from their boards with a heavy heart - I've already been approached by someone to do that and I was happy to oblige.
I hope this helps people understand a little bit and you can understand my frustration with the matter - I am not 100% certain that I am correct on all these points, but this is how I see them after researching as much as I could and reading and rereading the Pinterest terms and until I can see a way that this isn't how it is, then I don't think I can keep using Pinterest in the same way as I did before.

So, what do you think about Pinterest? How do you see the situation?

Further reading:
The Window Seat - where I first read about it and probably a more concise read. haha.
Blogging with Amy - an interesting read with tips for bloggers included.

p.s. if you read all of this, you are a hero!

 

Leeds through their eyes: Darren aka Pancho Ballard

Saturday was the Lomography Leeds Xmas Meet Up and I was very excited to go and catch up with a few people that I met in Manchester and also to meet new people. I love meeting people!  Especially people who don't think that I'm crazy for having as many cameras as I do, haha. Although I haven't had any of my films developed yet (gah!), some people already have and I'm excited to be sharing their photos on here. First up is Darren, aka Pancho Ballard

{how amazing is that camera?!}

Aren't they great? I absolutely love Darren's photos of people, he captures the moment so well and of course I love his photos of Leeds as well. I think sometimes I forget that there is so much to take photos of in Leeds, so it was interesting watching what people were taking photos of on Saturday.

You can see Darren's album of photos on Lomography here

Photographer: Darren aka Pancho Ballard
Camera: Minolta XG-M
Film: Ilford HP5 (developed by Darren!)


These photos are used with Darren's permission so please do not reuse them.